Home » IGP and Schutzhund » Schutzhund Titles and Levels

Schutzhund Titles and Levels

What a Schutzhund Title Represents

A Schutzhund title is a formal record of a dog’s performance at a trial, assessed under the rules in force for that event. Its meaning depends on the title designation and the recorded outcome, rather than on assumptions about the dog in every situation. Record details can help identify which trial and rule framework produced the result. Schutzhund Training Guide is an independent English-language information guide, not a shop, service provider, school, or organization; it is not a former project of this domain and offers no products or services.

A recorded trial result

A title records an outcome under a particular set of trial rules; records may include several details that identify the result and its context.

  • Title designation: The abbreviation and level, such as BH/VT or IGP 1, identify the credential recorded rather than provide a general description of the dog.
  • Trial date and event: The date and event details place the result in time and help distinguish it from other entries in the dog’s record.
  • Governing organization: The club or body responsible for the trial helps identify the rule framework and record-keeping system applied at that event.
  • Recorded result: A pass or other outcome, points, or phase marks may appear, depending on the trial format and the official record supplied.
  • Entry identification: Where shown, the dog’s registered name or identification number and handler’s name help match the result to the correct trial entry.

Together, these fields describe a specific trial result; records may vary in which details they display.

Titles and training ability

A title confirms a result in the exercises and conditions assessed at a particular trial. It does not guarantee a dog’s temperament, suitability for a specific working role, or performance in settings beyond those conditions. A dog may complete the tested tasks successfully and still respond differently to unfamiliar people, environments, equipment, or demands that were not part of that assessment.

Performance also reflects the trial-day partnership between dog and handler, including the dog’s training, experience, and readiness on that date. A recorded result is therefore useful evidence of demonstrated performance, not a complete profile of the animal. For example, a title alone cannot establish how consistently a dog works across different locations or whether its behavior meets the needs of a particular home or job. Those broader judgments require information beyond a single trial record.

BH/VT in Context

BH/VT is associated with the working-dog sport pathway, but its meaning depends on the rules governing a particular event. The name is commonly used for a companion-dog and traffic-surety assessment. Its broad purpose is different from a universal entry condition for every sport title. The organization and event rules determine how the test is applied.

Purpose of the test

BH/VT is generally a companion-dog and traffic-surety test: it looks at whether a dog can work with its handler and behave reliably in everyday public surroundings. The focus is practical control and composure, such as responding to the handler while encountering people, other dogs, and ordinary street activity. Traffic-surety describes this public-facing aspect; it does not mean the dog is being assessed for advanced protection work.

Depending on the trial system, the assessment may combine a structured obedience routine with observations in a public setting. The balance and specific exercises are set by the applicable rules, rather than by the abbreviation alone. As a foundation associated with German Shepherd sport training and other working-dog disciplines, BH/VT can mark an early stage in a handler’s training path. It is not, by itself, proof of readiness for every later sport level.

Check the applicable rules

Confirm the rules for the actual event before treating BH/VT as a requirement or interpreting its result. These details can change how the test fits into a sport pathway:

  • Governing organization: Check whether the event follows the International Working Dog Test Regulations, a national organization’s rules, or another recognized trial system.
  • Country: National organizations may apply local provisions or procedures, so a test held in one country may not serve the same role elsewhere.
  • Rule edition: Find the edition in force for the event date; older handbooks or training notes may describe superseded requirements.
  • Event context: Verify whether BH/VT is offered as a standalone companion-dog examination or is specified as a step in that event’s sport pathway.

Use the event organizer’s current rule reference to confirm which provisions apply to the scheduled trial.

IGP 1, IGP 2 and IGP 3

IGP 1, IGP 2 and IGP 3 are successive trial levels in the sport, each involving tracking, obedience and protection. Their numbered designations show an ordered progression, while the precise demands at each level are set by the applicable regulations. The International Working Dog Test Regulations provide the framework for trial requirements and assessment. Consult the current rulebook for details that can change, including eligibility, exercises, scoring and progression.

Progression through levels

The levels form a sequence from IGP 1 through IGP 3; the number identifies the trial tier, not a score or a guarantee of readiness for the next level. IGP 1 requirements, and the demands that follow, should be checked against the current regulations.

How the IGP numbers indicate successive trial levels
LevelDesignationDetails to verify in the current rulebook
IGP 1First level in the numbered IGP progression.Confirm eligibility, the required exercises in each phase, scoring criteria and any conditions for entering this level.
IGP 2Second level, following IGP 1 in the sequence.Check how exercises and evaluation differ from IGP 1, plus eligibility and any progression requirements that apply.
IGP 3Third level and the highest of these three numbered levels.Verify the current exercise demands, scoring rules and eligibility or progression conditions; do not infer them from the level number alone.

Comparing the levels means looking at the complete rule set, not simply assuming that every exercise becomes harder in the same way. Trial officials apply the regulations in force for the event, so the current edition is the reference for each requirement.

Shared sport phases

Each IGP level is organized around three phases: tracking, obedience and protection. The phases assess different aspects of a working dog’s performance, and together they make up the sport’s trial framework.

The three phases and their broad roles in an IGP trial
PhaseBroad focusRole in the trial
TrackingScent work and the dog’s ability to follow a track under the conditions set for the level.Provides the tracking component of the trial; exact track setup, exercises and evaluation come from the current regulations.
ObedienceHandler-directed work, control and the dog’s response to commands.Provides the obedience component; the required work and scoring are defined by the applicable level and rulebook.
ProtectionControlled protection work carried out in the trial setting.Provides the protection component; permitted procedures, exercises and assessment are governed by current regulations.

The phases are distinct, but they belong to one IGP trial rather than three unrelated titles. Results from tracking, obedience and protection are assessed within the relevant level’s framework, so a phase name alone does not specify its exercises or weight in the result.

For accurate preparation, match training to the level being entered and check the current rules for the trial date. That keeps the three-phase structure clear without relying on exercise details remembered from an older edition.

Reading Title Abbreviations

Abbreviations in trial records identify a title or test, but their presentation can differ between organizations and countries. BH/VT and IGP are recognizable labels, while nearby dates, scores, and judge details serve other record-keeping purposes. A dog’s name may be printed before or after a designation, depending on the record format. Reading the label alongside its issuing organization and trial date helps clarify the terminology.

Names and suffixes

A title label is the short designation attached to a result, not every entry printed beside a dog’s name. A record might show “BH/VT” or “IGP 1” after the registered name; another organization may place the same label in a separate title or result column. Spacing, punctuation, and capitalization can vary, so the exact visual format is not a universal standard for Schutzhund titles.

BH/VT identifies the Companion dog examination designation, while an IGP label includes its level number, such as IGP 1, IGP 2, or IGP 3. Details such as a trial date, score, judge’s name, or club are usually record fields, not suffixes forming part of the title. For example, “IGP 2” is the title label; “94 points” beside it is a result detail. When a dog’s name carries several labels, check the column headings and issuing organization before treating every abbreviation as a title.

Historical terminology

Schutzhund, IPO, and IGP are terms encountered in different periods of the sport’s rule history, but they are not interchangeable labels on every document. Schutzhund is the longstanding name many handlers use for the sport; IPO appears in older rule-era records, and IGP is the terminology used in current International Working Dog Test Regulations associated with the FCI. FCI rule materials adopted IGP terminology for regulations effective in 2019, so an older record may retain IPO wording even when its result remains part of a dog’s history.

Interpret the wording with the issuing body and date in view. A national organization may preserve familiar local terminology, translate a designation differently, or format titles under its own record system. A certificate dated before 2019 that says IPO and a later record marked IGP therefore reflect different terminology contexts; the abbreviation alone does not establish which rule edition or organization issued the result. Check the date and organization printed on the record to identify how its title wording was used at that time.